CorePBS
Fictional training example · no real participant data
Interactive Diagnostic Explainer · example output

Understanding Mia.

A completed fictional example showing how a complex diagnostic profile can be translated into functional implications, interaction effects and practical Positive Behaviour Support considerations without reducing the person to a list of labels.

ParticipantMia Lawson · fictional
Age14 years
ContextRegional NSW · secondary school
PurposeTeam education + implementation support
01 · Start with the person

A profile, not a pile of diagnoses.

The useful question is not “which diagnosis caused this behaviour?” It is “what does Mia need in this situation, and what evidence helps us understand that?”

Mia Lawson

Mia is a fictional 14-year-old who loves animals, digital art, swimming and knowing the plan before the day begins. She communicates verbally, uses short written checklists well and is much more confident when adults are predictable and give her processing time.

Autism Spectrum Disorder · Level 2ADHD · combined presentationDevelopmental Language DisorderMild Intellectual DisabilityGeneralised Anxiety Disorder
CorePBS reframe.
Mia’s behaviour is interpreted in context. Diagnostic information can help explain vulnerability, processing load and support needs, but direct observation, health information, communication and functional assessment remain essential.
02 · Interaction effects

The overlaps matter.

Tap an interaction to see how two or more parts of the profile may combine in everyday situations. These are formulation examples, not automatic conclusions.

Interaction 01

Language × anxiety

When Mia is worried, the amount of language she can process drops. A long explanation delivered at the exact moment she is unsure can increase uncertainty rather than reduce it.

  • Use fewer words when stress rises.
  • Pair speech with a written or visual anchor.
  • Check understanding through action, not “do you understand?”
03 · Brain + function

Translate labels into support needs.

This layer helps a team connect the diagnostic picture to the functions that matter during real interactions: planning, regulation, communication, learning, sensory processing and connection.

01
Executive functioning
Inhibition · working memory · planning · shifting
Mia may begin a task before fully hearing the instruction, lose track of multi-step sequences and find unexpected changes difficult to reorganise around. Support: one step at a time, visible sequences, transition warnings and external reminders.
02
Threat + regulation
Stress · uncertainty · fight / flight / freeze
Uncertainty, perceived criticism and crowded environments can increase Mia’s physiological load. Support: lower language, reduce public correction, create a predictable exit or break option and allow recovery before problem solving.
03
Learning + memory
Encoding · retrieval · generalisation
Learning is strongest when information is concrete, repeated and connected to a familiar routine. A skill demonstrated in one setting may not automatically transfer to another. Support: teach across contexts and keep examples concrete.
04
Communication
Understanding · expression · repair
Mia’s conversational speech can make her comprehension look stronger than it is. Under stress, she may answer quickly, repeat a familiar phrase or say “I don’t know”. Support: simplify, pause, verify, and make refusal/help/break language easy to use.
05
Sensory processing
Noise · movement · crowding · internal signals
Busy classrooms, layered voices and unpredictable touch can consume attention that would otherwise be available for learning and self-management. Support: reduce avoidable sensory competition and plan access to quieter regulation spaces.
06
Social connection
Belonging · interpretation · safety
Mia wants friendship but may misread sarcasm, hidden rules or changing group dynamics. Support: make expectations explicit, teach repair scripts and avoid assuming social mistakes are intentional.
04 · Each diagnosis

What each label contributes—and what it cannot tell us.

Open each diagnosis. The structure keeps the explanation practical: what it means, likely functional implications, what might be observed, what support should do, and the limits of diagnosis-only reasoning.

01
Autism Spectrum Disorder · Level 2
Social communication differences + restricted / repetitive patterns requiring substantial support
Functional implications

Predictability, interpreting social information, flexibility, sensory processing and communication under stress may all require active support.

What we might observe

Distress with unexpected change, strong preference for known routines, literal interpretation, focused interests and increased overload in noisy group settings.

What support should do

Make the plan visible, explain change early, reduce unnecessary ambiguity, protect regulation strategies and teach social expectations explicitly.

Strengths to use

Deep interests, strong recall for preferred information, honesty, persistence and comfort with predictable systems can become powerful learning anchors.

Limit: autism does not explain every episode of distress. Pain, fatigue, communication mismatch, anxiety, task difficulty and learning history still need to be considered.
02
ADHD · combined presentation
Differences in attention regulation, inhibition and activity level
Functional implications

Holding instructions in mind, waiting, stopping an impulse, organising materials and sustaining effort on low-interest tasks may require external structure.

What we might observe

Starting before instructions finish, losing track of multi-step tasks, frequent movement, rapid responding or difficulty returning to a task after interruption.

What support should do

Shorten steps, externalise the plan, reduce long verbal instructions, build movement in proactively and make the next action obvious.

Strengths to use

High energy, humour, creativity, rapid idea generation and strong engagement when a task is meaningful or novel.

Limit: ADHD should not be used as shorthand for “won’t concentrate”. Attention is shaped by task difficulty, motivation, sleep, anxiety, sensory load and the environment.
03
Developmental Language Disorder
Persistent difficulty understanding and/or using spoken language
Functional implications

Long sentences, abstract language, fast questions, hidden meanings and verbal-only instructions can create more load than Mia’s conversational style suggests.

What we might observe

Quick “yes” responses, guessing, delayed replies, topic shifts, frustration, silence or apparent refusal after language-heavy demands.

What support should do

Use plain language, one idea at a time, visual or written supports, processing pauses and opportunities to show rather than explain.

Strengths to use

Visual learning, familiar scripts, concrete examples and written key words can help Mia demonstrate more than verbal questioning alone reveals.

Limit: fluent speech is not the same as fluent comprehension. Staff should not infer understanding from eye contact, agreement or sentence length alone.
04
Mild Intellectual Disability
Cognitive and adaptive support needs that affect everyday learning and independence
Functional implications

New learning may require more repetition, practical demonstration and support to generalise from one person, setting or example to another.

What we might observe

Strong performance in familiar routines alongside difficulty with novel problem solving, abstract consequences or tasks containing several hidden steps.

What support should do

Teach concretely, demonstrate the end point, practise across settings and avoid withdrawing support simply because one routine has become familiar.

Strengths to use

Repetition, routine, meaningful roles and practical learning can build stable skills and confidence over time.

Limit: an intellectual disability does not remove preference, agency, personality or the right to be involved in decisions. Support the decision-making process rather than replacing the person.
05
Generalised Anxiety Disorder
Persistent and difficult-to-control worry across everyday situations
Functional implications

Uncertainty can consume processing capacity, make transitions harder and increase reliance on reassurance or avoidance.

What we might observe

Repeated checking, reluctance to start, seeking certainty, physical tension, irritability, tearfulness or withdrawal when expectations feel unclear.

What support should do

Increase predictability without creating endless reassurance loops, use gradual exposure only where clinically appropriate, and build tolerable steps with clear endings.

Strengths to use

Mia can identify some early worry signs and responds well to written plans, choice, trusted adults and predictable preparation.

Limit: not every avoidance response is anxiety. Functional assessment still needs to consider task demands, sensory load, communication, reinforcement and physical wellbeing.
05 · Daily support

Make the environment do more of the work.

The highest-value strategies are usually the ones that reduce avoidable load before Mia needs a behaviour to communicate that the situation is too much.

01

Communication access

Short sentences, visible key words, one instruction at a time and enough silence for processing. Avoid rapid rephrasing while Mia is still working on the first version.

02

Predictability + transitions

Show what is happening, what is changing, what is staying the same and what “finished” looks like. Use countdowns only when they genuinely help.

03

Sensory + regulation

Plan quieter work areas, movement and recovery time before known high-load periods rather than waiting for escalation.

04

Choice + control

Offer two real options, make “not now / help / break” available, and avoid presenting a predetermined outcome as a choice.

05

Learning design

Demonstrate, practise in small steps, repeat across contexts and use strengths such as digital art or animals as engagement bridges.

06

Relationship + co-regulation

Use a calm, private, non-shaming response. When stress is high, connection and clarity come before explanation or correction.

06 · Environment

Capacity changes with context.

Good PBS tracks the conditions around the person as carefully as the behaviour itself. These are the kinds of contextual variables the team would keep testing.

Conditions where things tend to go well

  • Known staff and a visible plan
  • Tasks broken into short concrete steps
  • Quiet work area with movement available
  • Choice between genuinely available options
  • Time to process before another prompt is added

Conditions that increase load

  • Multiple adults speaking at once
  • Unexpected changes without a visual update
  • Long language-heavy tasks
  • Public correction or perceived criticism
  • Late-day fatigue and crowded environments

Protective factors to preserve

  • Strong relationship with Mum and older sister
  • Trusted learning support teacher
  • Swimming, animals and digital art
  • Written schedules and checklists
  • Mia’s emerging ability to ask for a break

Questions still requiring assessment

  • Which transition features are most predictive of escalation?
  • How much does sleep quality alter afternoon capacity?
  • Which break requests are independently initiated?
  • How consistently are strategies implemented across staff?
  • What outcomes follow escalation in different settings?
07 · One-page synthesis

The team should be able to hold this.

The point of a diagnostic explainer is not to create more jargon. It is to help the people around the participant make better moment-to-moment decisions.

Mia’s support picture in four moves.

The person

A creative, relationship-oriented teenager who does best when expectations are visible, concrete and predictable.

The functional picture

Language, executive-function, learning, sensory and anxiety-related loads can compound. Capacity is lower when several demands arrive at once.

What support needs to do

Reduce verbal load, externalise the plan, preserve regulation and choice, teach across contexts and respond without shame.

What we are still testing

Functional hypotheses remain provisional until direct data show which antecedents, outcomes and implementation variables reliably matter.

Fictional training example only. This resource is not a diagnosis, clinical assessment or substitute for the participant’s Behaviour Support Plan, health plans or treating clinicians. Diagnostic labels should never be used to infer the function of behaviour without assessment.